From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 18 11:21:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pi.yip.org (pi.yip.org [199.45.111.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D6037B408 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (melange@localhost) by pi.yip.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f9IIL9L29411 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:21:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from melange@yip.org) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:21:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Bob K To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dirpref gives massive performance boost In-Reply-To: <200110181806.f9II6Yn92967@lurza.secnetix.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Oliver Fromme wrote: > The presence of the dirprefs code in the kernel has > NO influence on newfs at all. Read my lips: newfs > does NOT enable dirprefs. If I've been reading this thread correctly, David Chapman has been asking if there's a method of examining the directory structure of a disk to determine if none, some, or all of it was written using the new dirprefs code, which is a different question than the one you and others have been answering... -- Bob | We're all wrong. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message