From owner-freebsd-git@freebsd.org Tue Feb 9 21:30:16 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-git@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801E452BC3A for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 21:30:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (mail.inka.de [IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DZwzC4T1Vz3tQd for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 21:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mips.inka.de (news@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1l9aaE-00BaaS-7G; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 22:30:06 +0100 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 119LRrqb002044 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 22:27:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from news@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from news@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 119LRr7s002043 for freebsd-git@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 22:27:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from news) To: freebsd-git@freebsd.org From: Christian Weisgerber Newsgroups: list.freebsd.git Subject: got(1) in base (was: Re: gitup(1) in base) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 21:27:53 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <49046db6-88d9-d59d-85f5-ecc1321b07c6@siemens.com> User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DZwzC4T1Vz3tQd X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of news@mips.inka.de has no SPF policy when checking 2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c) smtp.mailfrom=news@mips.inka.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c:from]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[news]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-git@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[inka.de]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:202113, ipnet:2a04:c9c7::/32, country:DE]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[naddy@mips.inka.de,news@mips.inka.de]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-git] X-BeenThere: freebsd-git@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of git use in the FreeBSD project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 21:30:16 -0000 On 2021-02-08, "Osipov, Michael (LDA IT PLM)" wrote: > I'd like to raise the question whether gitup(1) [1] can be included in > base? Where are we with the inclusion of got(1) [1] in base? * It has reached a good maturity level * Stefan Sperling reacts quite fast to issues * It makes the base system complete and suitably replaces svnlite * It does not impose the huge complexity and dependency hierarchy of the original Git client on admins and other non-developers The original hold-up appears to have been an ex nihilo requirement that it must be Capsicum-ized. Somebody was working on this, but has gone silent. gitup is not Capsicum-ized either. [1] https://gameoftrees.org/ -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de