Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:11:19 +1000 (EST) From: Andrew MacIntyre <andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/12381: Bad scheduling in FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.OS2.3.95.990626220319.103A-100000@CENTRAL> In-Reply-To: <199906251750.KAA30066@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > The following reply was made to PR kern/12381; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> > To: Thomas Schuerger <schuerge@wjpserver.CS.Uni-SB.DE> > Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: kern/12381: Bad scheduling in FreeBSD > Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:42:05 +0200 > > On Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:40:29 +0200, Thomas Schuerger wrote: > > > The tests I did may not be the best ones to choose, but they ARE > > real-life scenarios. And I DID an FTP test, demonstrating that > > network transfer speed drops by about 25%. I would be glad if you > > had some suggestions about what tests I could do. > > I just wonder if there isn't something _else_ at play that makes your > results so different from Jose's. I'm no guru, but I suspect that the reported symptoms are related to our relatively unsophisticated SMP infrastructure (ie single giant kernel lock etc). I draw this conclusion because performance results from uniprocessor systems are degraded much less noticeably under the given process load. This is a separate from the scheduler/nice issue. -- Andrew I MacIntyre "These thoughts are mine alone..." E-mail: andrew.macintyre@aba.gov.au (work) | Snail: PO Box 370 andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au (play) | Belconnen ACT 2616 Fido: Andrew MacIntyre, 3:620/243.18 | Australia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OS2.3.95.990626220319.103A-100000>