From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 24 17:41:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA8516A446; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:41:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A8243DB5; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:40:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1OHe7ih065979; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:40:08 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id k1OHe7Ok065973; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:40:07 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:40:07 +0300 From: Yar Tikhiy To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Message-ID: <20060224174007.GF36227@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20060218012029.e146e2ff.rosti.bsd@gmail.com> <20060219104912.GB20500@comp.chem.msu.su> <20060219225701.0e3e244b.rosti.bsd@gmail.com> <20060221165959.GB77513@comp.chem.msu.su> <20060222024430.ad4b5c60.rosti.bsd@gmail.com> <20060223235727.33cddb13.rosti.bsd@gmail.com> <20060224155153.f7da1a52.rosti.bsd@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org, dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, Rostislav Krasny , des@des.no, mak@ll.mit.edu, MH@kernel32.de Subject: Re: SSH login takes very long time...sometimes X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:41:15 -0000 On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:08:21AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > > >>>>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:51:53 +0200 > >>>>> Rostislav Krasny said: > > rosti> Excellent! What about RES_DFLRETRY decreasing from 4 to 2? Does it need > rosti> more testing or discussion? > > It seems reasonable to me, and there are no objection here. So, I've > just committed both into HEAD. IMHO the only principal reservation about changing RES_DFLRETRY was that its effect was unobvious due to the bug you've just fixed. Now all should be OK. Thank you a lot! To Rostislav: Could you do now, with the resolver fixes applied, the following experiment: find how many dead nameservers in resolv.conf it takes for sshd to start timing out a connection to it? There is still your PR open on this issue, so we should see whether the default for LoginGraceTime needs a change, too. Thanks! -- Yar