From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 05:42:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F433106564A for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 05:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8288FC0A for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 05:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9L5gDv8065691 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:42:19 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk o9L5gDv8065691 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1287639739; bh=m8/SKaqdMWmHW3lNw0xlHHFh0SeMg+NSgnYz+XUcwAM=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4CBFD2AE.7080402@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20T hu,=2021=20Oct=202010=2006:42:06=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac= 20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-GB=3B=20rv:1.9.2.11)=20Gecko/20101013=20Th underbird/3.1.5|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Marwan=20Sultan=20|CC:=20FreeBSD=20Questions=20|Subject:=20Re:=20My=20mail=20server=20flagged=20spam!| References:=20|In-Rep ly-To:=20|X-Enigmail- Version:=201.1.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipar t/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application /pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigC6CCF6B7F15 A819A07182637"; b=ig5UyMUT0cY9Cuv/XUU4dvgQT3YvvChsa511OzzTpgHhcSZkDKNQq8tg3obSPr7dr SNUav877p00YhH84BDOQg5rCrh+IRIDihMGRyrHKbPWz6fuuPijcFa345llHdyjm7Q vFwYJigIMPfT+u5LMuFFPMM6PPcjGOMKVEQidOJA= Message-ID: <4CBFD2AE.7080402@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:42:06 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marwan Sultan References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC6CCF6B7F15A819A07182637" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: My mail server flagged spam! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 05:42:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC6CCF6B7F15A819A07182637 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/10/2010 01:10, Marwan Sultan wrote: > if I check that domain in mxtoolbox.com > it complains "Warning - Reverse DNS does not match SMTP Banner" > could it be the SMTP banner flagging the mail as spam? This is certainly possible. It would add spam points on my servers. The address in question is the one presented by your mail server during the SMTP dialogue -- the first line it sends in fact. Something like thi= s: EHLO smtp.example.com By default it will use the hostname of your server, but you can override that. It is this address that you have to be really strict about: the address should resolve to the IP that the server connects via (not necessarily the IP of the server if there are NAT gateways involved), and a reverse lookup of that IP should return the name again. This name used in the EHLO banner doesn't have to be anything to do with the addresses on the e-mail, except in as far as either side is using SPF and you have chosen to add that information to the SPF selector(s). SPF seems to be going out of favour now, and sensible mail admins didn't make accept/deny decisions entirely on pass/fail of SPF tests, but still, for best results with a mail system, you should take care to get that right. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigC6CCF6B7F15A819A07182637 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAky/0rUACgkQ8Mjk52CukIz1RwCgg3yP8orqDmuHUfYa6JD3gaUD h9QAn3aWWpnwn9FNpmfD3UCSy1L+pX3q =YyNC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC6CCF6B7F15A819A07182637--