From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 04:27:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040E916A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 04:27:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8198D43D2D for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 04:27:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jayobrien@att.net) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (dsl093-180-184.sac1.dsl.speakeasy.net[66.93.180.184]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with ESMTP id <200503280427181110013okve>; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 04:27:18 +0000 Message-ID: <424787A5.8070406@att.net> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:27:17 -0800 From: Jay O'Brien User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD - questions References: <424769D0.5030500@att.net> <20050328023133.GA46123@thened.net> <42477548.70906@att.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 04:27:20 -0000 Abu Khaled wrote: > ezm3, gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool are the build dependencies for > cvsup-without-gui. > > # cd /usr/ports > # make search name="cvsup-without-gui" > Abu, I don't get that result. I only show ezm3-1.2. # cd /usr/ports # make search name="cvsup-without-gui" Port: cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2 Path: /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui Info: General network file distribution system optimized for CVS (non-GUI version) Maint: jdp@FreeBSD.org B-deps: ezm3-1.2 R-deps: WWW: http://www.cvsup.org/ # > If you updated your soirces/ports "cvsup" then portupgrade did what > you asked it to do. It Updated all outdated packages/ports and there > dependencies. I'm convinced that you are right. However, why don't I show the other dependencies? Jay