From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 11 0:52:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shark.harmonic.co.il (jupiter.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4115E37B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 00:52:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roman@harmonic.co.il) Received: from localhost (roman@localhost) by shark.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20572; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:52:31 +0200 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:52:30 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon To: Kris Kennaway Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: lots of updates In-Reply-To: <20010304020209.A29788@mollari.cthul.hu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: ..snip.. > > The big news is the new CPUTYPE code (described in > /etc/defaults/make.conf), which is a hook for describing the CPU type > you want to optimize the build for (pentium, pentium pro, alpha EV6, > ...). The makefile logic will add the correct gcc compiler flags to ..snip.. I *think* that for K6-2 having -march=pentium gives better performance than -march=k6 ; could someone prove it or prove it wrong? Thanks, --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message