From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jan 6 16:27:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA15182 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 16:27:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from cedb.dpcsys.com (CEDB.DPCSYS.com [207.124.154.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA15171 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 16:27:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dan@localhost) by cedb.dpcsys.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with SMTP id AAA06101; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 00:16:35 GMT Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 16:16:34 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Busarow To: Jacob Suter cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gated/freebsd 2.2-beta problems.... In-Reply-To: <199701060834.CAA01986@intrastar.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 6 Jan 1997, Jacob Suter wrote: > Gated reports the network interfaces are "down"... I kill gated and > restart and it comes right back up to go down in 3-5 minutes... There's a parameter in the gated config file to mark interfaces as "passive" (I think that's the term) which prevents them from being marked down. But in your case, why run gated or routed at all? A default route pointing at your 206 net and a specific route pointing to the 10 net should work just fine. Dan -- Dan Busarow 714 443 4172 DPC Systems dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82