From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov 18 15:40:13 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B735763;
 Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:40:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC768FC15;
 Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:40:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
 [212.40.38.100])
 by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA04137;
 Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:40:10 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
 by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
 id 1Ta6yg-000994-5y; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:40:10 +0200
Message-ID: <50A90158.9010309@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:40:08 +0200
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD needs Git to ensure repo integrity [was: 2012 incident]
References: <CAD2Ti29UoFcHendR8CcdQ4FPNW1HH0O47B1i3JW00Lke2m2POg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121117221143.41c29ba2@nonamehost> <op.wnxq9eo0g7njmm@michael-think>
 <CADLo838oG26KmfHJ+tLh82GoJzzRtfqy69+Nny1_DC8F8X4POQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <50a8eb34.5pMwq6kSsi47QgKI%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
 <20121118073128.GG73505@kib.kiev.ua>
 <CAJ-Vmom6+S3HDuOF6woWyvST1JVPjwV6GUs2RJGtfD_z_YVNDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <50A8BD0F.7030609@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAJ-VmonTBUpCNXZuWoWbn2XRVMU2bM2uqjZBhz9+uv4ZU6LW6w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonTBUpCNXZuWoWbn2XRVMU2bM2uqjZBhz9+uv4ZU6LW6w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org,
 Perry Hutchison <perryh@pluto.rain.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:40:13 -0000

on 18/11/2012 16:04 Adrian Chadd said the following:
> On 18 November 2012 02:48, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
>> What you describe is not a workflow issue, but a local development
>> environment(s) setup issue.
> 
> Which is a workflow issue.

Well, this is what I understand as workflow:
google://git workflow
http://git-scm.com/book/en/Distributed-Git-Distributed-Workflows
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/gitworkflows.html

"Local workflow" is up to each developer to set up.

> I mean, we could bang heads on semantics for hours on end,

Indeed.

> or we can
> realise that git isn't a magic bullet for FreeBSD development.

I haven't heard anyone saying that.

-- 
Andriy Gapon