Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Nov 1998 13:38:05 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Eddie Lawhead <eddie@silk.net>
To:        pat.groce@state.sd.us
Cc:        jlemon@americantv.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   RE: unix is a problem: free bsd doesn't help
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.01.9811091334480.2241-100000@myname.my.domain>
In-Reply-To: <5D2C95997022D21187350008C7F4CF793E6C00@ESPR1SRV5.state.sd.us>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I quote "this os is not for the bussiness world"

Try http://www.yahoo.com  --- just for starters.

Why blame things on a OS?  It is after all "only" on OS.
HHMMM...  My drive broke so I upgraded to a version I have never
tried and then cried when it didn't work...well no kidding.

Good Luck with NT
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Eddie H. Lawhead                     FreeBSD, The power to Serve.
eddie@silk.net                                Kelowna, BC, Canada
                 #include <stddisclaimer.h>
Basic, n.:
      A programming language.  Related to certain social diseases
   in that those who have it will not admit it in polite company.           
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

On Mon, 9 Nov 1998 pat.groce@state.sd.us wrote:

#I couldn't get anything but 3.0 over the net. I mean i download boot.flp and
#fdimage.exe, made my install disk, and 3.0 was what i got. DON'T BLAME ME, I
#DID EVERYTHING THE WWW.FREEBD.ORG TOLD ME TO FOR AN INSTALL. Why didn't the
#web site or setup program warn me not to install 3.0? 
#
#The web page at http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/install.html made it all
#sound so simple. I didn't know there were hidden issues!
#
#If the system isn't configured correctly its FREEBSD'S fault! Why can't a
#fresh install even stand on two legs? So what if its out of disk space? Not
#my fault. It should have configured the partitions correctly from the first
#place. What a joke! And you're blaming ME for the system having problems?
#
#ADMIT IT! FREEBSD CAN NEVER HOLD A CANDLE TO NT. ONLY A MOUNTAIN TROLL WHO
#SPENDS HIS DAYS SLOBBERING OVER A KEYBOARD HACKING SYSTEM CODE COULD EVER
#GET IT WORKING.
#
#This os is not for the business world!
#-----Original Message-----
#From: Jonathan Lemon [mailto:jlemon@americantv.com]
#Sent: Monday, November 09, 1998 10:27 AM
#To: pat.groce@state.sd.us
#Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
#Subject: Re: unix is a problem: free bsd doesn't help
#
#
#On Nov 11, 1998 at 10:01:11AM -0600, pat.groce@state.sd.us wrote:
#> We had been running freebsd for 4 years to handle our internet email. Last
#> week the hard drive crashed on the system. I had a tape backup of
#important
#> files so i reinstalled using the new freebsd 3.0 version.
#
#Let me get this straight; You had a system crash, so instead of
#re-installing a known good system, you upgrade a production system
#to the bleeding edge (3.0) without any prior testing?
#
#Honestly, this was a mistake, and the version that should have
#been installed was installed was 2.2.7.
#
#
#> cryptic errors. Sendmail keeps giving me an error:
#> sendmail[131]: NOQUEUE: low on space (have 0, SMTP-DAEMON needs 101 in
#> /var/spool/mqueue)
#
#So, sendmail gives you an error message saying that it is out of 
#disk space, and you blame it on sendmail?  No offense, but it 
#sounds to me like the system isn't configured correctly.
#
#
#> To hell with FreeBSD. We are replacing all of the systems with NT versions
#> of sendmail. And it works great! I neat little GUI makes sendmail and the
#> Exchange listservs easy to manage.The software may cost more, but in terms
#> of staff time, we're saving thousands, not to mention all the frustration.
#>
#> I read all the news on how unix is going to give microsoft a run for the
#> operating system market. I don't believe it for a second.
#
#You are welcome to your opinion.  If NT works better for you,
#then by all means, use it.
#
#FreeBSD is powerful, and can do anything that you want it to do. 
#However, it setting it up and maintaining it does require more 
#knowledge on the administrator's part than NT.  In return, it 
#can provide "years of trouble-free operation"(tm).
#
#You did note that FreeBSD handled your email for 4 years before a
#harddrive crash.  Please feel free to give us a summary in 4 years
#from now of how well NT behaves in doing the same task.
#--
#Jonathan
#
#To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
#with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
#
#


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.01.9811091334480.2241-100000>