From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 31 17:42:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1139106564A; Thu, 31 May 2012 17:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.253.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8939E8FC08; Thu, 31 May 2012 17:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (rideseveral.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.160.231]) by mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id q4VHfuHJ016911; Thu, 31 May 2012 10:41:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1338486118; bh=4twq2wDv++j7vnN4b3qJP1lW0qDZ8eWANF8JnTdVQxM=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=h8KuBrFYjTj85tw9tioB8fPqyHom8R2OLPjc9bGQj4KPm97Z+UXdGcglYHJ4no4m3 4RxWjY2FktTcN/yaXnEFBFJUaP26GZiF/HcPGQb21Rn2hVlq0kQeY7yRvP/cvbBgFT Hnax+qZ0Lf/B4reCSgK5hNqTlA0tJC8lQ1p6KUdY= From: Sean Bruno To: "obrien@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <20120531031925.GB77656@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <1337890075.2709.16.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> <20120531031925.GB77656@dragon.NUXI.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 10:41:56 -0700 Message-ID: <1338486116.2985.9.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Milter-Version: master.31+4-gbc07cd5+ X-CLX-ID: 486117001 Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: bash 4.2 patchlevel 28 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 17:42:22 -0000 On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 20:19 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:07:55PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > Noted that the following syntax is broken somewhere between 4.2 > > patchlevel 10 and 28. I'm sure its because we shouldn't be doing that > > over here at big purple, but we do ... and its a PITA. I'm bisecting to > > find out what is going on. > > Hi Sean, > Were you able to track down which patch 10-28 broke this for you? > > thanks, After reverting back to patchlevel 10, I applied patches sequentially. something about patchlevel 12 caused issues for our homebrew builds via m4/bison that I haven't investigated.