Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 10:05:31 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Jeffrey Hsu <hsu@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libc_r bug Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960923100330.11191C-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199609220613.XAA28775@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 21 Sep 1996, Jeffrey Hsu wrote: > > _thread_fd_table_init() just sets up > > the table for a fd. fds 0, 1 and 2 don't have to be valid. > > Since we can't tell whether a given fd might need a call to > _thread_fd_table_init() or not, the correctness before all else > principle would argue for either pre-allocating all the fd entries > or doing it on demand by placing a call to _thread_fd_table_init() > in write() and all the other places where it might be needed. Of > these two, I prefer the second. What about you? > I prefer on demand too. Regards, Mike Hancock
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.960923100330.11191C-100000>