Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 01:18:15 +0200 From: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: It's time for those 2048-, 3072-, and 4096-bit keys? Message-ID: <20020402011815.D45946@mail.webmonster.de> In-Reply-To: <200204011848.g31ImGv55875@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@lcs.mit.edu on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 01:48:16PM -0500 References: <5.0.2.1.1.20020326024955.02392830@popserver.sfu.ca> <20020326034234.Q10197-100000@patrocles.silby.com> <20020326185714.F22539@mail.webmonster.de> <xzp8z89sgr1.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <200204011848.g31ImGv55875@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ZARJHfwaSJQLOEUz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Garrett Wollman(wollman@lcs.mit.edu)@2002.04.01 13:48:16 +0000: > <<On 31 Mar 2002 01:49:54 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> said: >=20 > > Some systems (like the SparcStation 5 that serves DNS, DHCP and NTP > > requests from my home network) are too slow for the algorithms used by > > ssh2. >=20 > It's perfectly acceptable on our IPX. The session takes a few seconds > to start, and the keys took a long time to generate, but once > authenticated there does not seem to be much difference to me. (In > fact, `cat /etc/termcap' takes consistently twice as long using v1 as > v2.) interresting. i observe a similar behaviour on my router (intel pentium 60, 4.4-stable 12/6/2001, ssh 2.0 20011202, protocol v2). generation of the server key takes ages (~3+ minutes)... regards, /k --=20 > The idea that Bill Gates has appeared like a knight in shining armour > to lead all customers out of a mire of technological chaos neatly ignores > the fact that it was he who, by peddling second-rate technology, led them > into it in the first place. --Douglas Adams in Guardian, August 25, 1995= =20 KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.n= et/ GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 B= F46 My mail is GnuPG signed -- Unsigned ones are bogus -- http://www.gnupg.org/ Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 1= 0x --ZARJHfwaSJQLOEUz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8qOq3M0BPTilkv0YRAmbJAJ4nOWHt3rqugfy0MY3CrK1y8XHuEwCgle9i IpMRqSZPcE0W7jbPtPudqTg= =iXqN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZARJHfwaSJQLOEUz-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020402011815.D45946>