From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Jun 25 11:11:18 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80ED037B401
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org)
Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97] ident=root)
	by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #7)
	id 15EapP-000INz-00
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:11:15 +0100
Received: (from jcm@localhost)
	by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f5PIBFn54221
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:11:15 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from jcm)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:11:14 +0100
From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: which is faster zip drive under FreeBSD: usb or parallel?
Message-ID: <20010625191114.A54171@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-questions.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-questions>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-questions>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


It would seem parallel has more throughput, but it might not be so simple.
Does anyone know how the usb zip compares to parallel port models?

Jonathon
--
Microsoft complaining about the source license used by 
Linux is like the event horizon calling the kettle black.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message