From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 00:06:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F71916A4DA for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:06:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04A143D6A for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:06:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.66.115]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060820000632.OBLS3509.mta10.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 20:06:32 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 66EDAB678; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:36:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:36:20 -0400 From: "'Anubhav A.'" To: Noah Message-ID: <20060819213620.GA5140@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Noah , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44E72508.9000909@enabled.com> <20060819161547.GA2452@holestein.holy.cow> <44E76C57.6040607@enabled.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44E76C57.6040607@enabled.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgdb -Fu failing: can't convert nil into String X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:06:37 -0000 in message <44E76C57.6040607@enabled.com>, wrote Noah thusly... > > parv@pair.com wrote: > >in message <44E72508.9000909@enabled.com>, wrote Noah thusly... > > > >>Somebody know what is going on here? I can't figure it out and > >>never seen this before. ... > >># pkgdb -Fu ---> Updating the pkgdb ---> Checking the package > >>registry database > >>Stale dependency: b2evolution-0.9.2 -> marked (): > >>marked: Not in due form: - ... > >Here, "marked" seems like some sort of place holder for the > >missing dependency port. The otherwise non empty "()" contain > >the port directory, under ${PORTSDIR:-/usr/ports}, of the > >dependency port. ... > okay thanks for the explanation - so what is the most optimal way > of fixing this without breaking things. I have not looked in the portupgrade source. Nonetheless, a quick+dirty, and heavy handed too (if the b2evolution port is large) would be to deinstall b2evolution & install it again, possibly remove|update old dependencies too if you like. - Parv --