From owner-freebsd-standards Wed Feb 19 19:16:10 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CB237B401; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:16:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx7.mail.ru (mx7.mail.ru [194.67.57.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5624E43F85; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:16:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kan@mail.ru) Received: from [141.154.59.211] (helo=kan.dnsalias.net) by mx7.mail.ru with esmtp (Exim SMTP.7) id 18lhBt-000BK0-00; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 06:16:05 +0300 Received: from kan.dnsalias.net (ak03@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kan.dnsalias.net (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h1K3G3LD084111; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:16:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kan@kan.dnsalias.net) Received: (from kan@localhost) by kan.dnsalias.net (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h1K3G2oS084110; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:16:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:16:02 -0500 From: Alexander Kabaev To: Tim Robbins Cc: mike@FreeBSD.ORG, rodrigc@attbi.com, freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG, kan@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX not defined in Message-Id: <20030219221602.365ec588.kabaev@bellatlantic.net> In-Reply-To: <20030220141410.A42150@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: <20030219223313.GA93707@attbi.com> <20030220112847.A36977@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20030219205726.G61431@espresso.bsdmike.org> <20030220141410.A42150@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> Reply-To: ak03@gte.com X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws18 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Linux just uses bits/_wchar.h for that purpose :) On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:14:10 +1100 Tim Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:57:26PM -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > > Tim Robbins writes: > > > I'll add a definition of WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX to as > > > soon as I can find a clean (non-polluting) way of doing it. > > > > Do we need a with underscored macro variants? > > Why the specification's authors couldn't keep all the limits in a > > single header, I'll never know. > > That would work. If the real information about limits was in > machine/_limits.h, machine/limits.h would be MI and could be > renamed to sys/limits.h if backwards compatibility was not > an issue. > > > > Tim > -- Alexander Kabaev To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message