From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Mar 10 12:21:17 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from et-gw.etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33BC37B718
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 12:21:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dennis@etinc.com)
Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18])
	by et-gw.etinc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA85678;
	Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:33:19 GMT
	(envelope-from dennis@etinc.com)
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20010310151202.02297a20@mail.etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@mail.etinc.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:22:46 -0500
To: romain@kzsu.stanford.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Subject: Re: if_fxp - the real point
In-Reply-To: <200103101849.KAA85992@kzsu.stanford.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 01:49 PM 03/10/2001, Romain Kang wrote:
>As a newcomer to this, I'm a little confused.  There's a slew
>of datasheets at Intel's web site
>         http://www.intel.com/design/network/datashts/index.htm
>that don't seem to require NDA.  (Just this week, I used the
>82559 docs to implement a polled version of if_fxp).

Is anyone up on the latest legal stuff? There was a ruling that 
universities cant be held liable for releasing NDA 
information....universities and states I think. I know we couldnt sell 
source to universities or the government because it wasnt protected (ie you 
couldnt sue them if it leaked out).

Maybe we can get an academic to sign something and leak out the info :-)

Dennis


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message