From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Apr 12 04:05:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA20607 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 04:05:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [194.77.0.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA20599; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 04:05:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id NAA23244; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 13:00:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id MAA06667; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 12:23:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19980412122308.64737@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 12:23:08 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: Satoshi Asami Cc: searle@longacre.demon.co.uk, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: need newer qt lib version for netscape-qt update References: <19980412102813.21776@klemm.gtn.com> <199804120905.CAA06975@bubble.didi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: <199804120905.CAA06975@bubble.didi.com>; from Satoshi Asami on Sun, Apr 12, 1998 at 02:05:38AM -0700 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Apr 12, 1998 at 02:05:38AM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * Hmm, so you expect with libqt as a moving target, that we soon > * might have to provide different versions of the lib because of > * possible incompatibilities ? > > Not necessarily. We might just decide to delete "qt" (version 1.3x) > when 1.4 comes out of beta. > > Either way, version numbers in a directory is a win. We have > countless examples of this (vim, gimp, tcl/tk, etc.), so please take > my word. ;) Ok. Currently I have a ready to commit libqt 1.33, which should be a stable version. Should we do a repository copy with it or simply bump the (-stable) 1.31 port ? What do you think ? The next round would be a rep copy for 1.39-snap or 1.40-snap ? I'm currently trying to find out, what's available. Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html powered by ,,symmetric multiprocessor FreeBSD'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message