From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 00:14:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D45016A420; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:14:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A816043D46; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:14:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885461A3C1D; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:14:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D536A51DA6; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:14:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:14:32 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Yoichi Nakayama Message-ID: <20060213001432.GA1411@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060212203335.GF93731@xor.obsecurity.org> <873biouomu.wl%yoichi@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <873biouomu.wl%yoichi@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, anray@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [ports-i386@FreeBSD.org: pure-xemacs21-mule-0.6_1 failed on i386 6] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:14:34 -0000 --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:46:17AM +0900, Yoichi Nakayama wrote: > Andray, > I've received following report that site-packages/lisp directory remains > after deletion of elisp port. I found other ports e.g. flim-xemacs21-mule > also meet the same problem. Would it be handled in indivisual ports or in > xemacs21-mule package (where site-packages/{etc,info,man,pkginfo} are handled)? The errors below indicate that the directory was created by this port, so as it stands, this means that this port needs to remove it. It might be better in the long term to make the xemacs packages handle such directories, but then you'd also have to make all the other ports stop trying to remove it themselves, so the patch might take a bit of work. Kris --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD789oWry0BWjoQKURAtINAJ0X/Rr5L/xOOMPB6mAqj46PGnpIywCgheXN 7JF1sJ78RVQx3rDFljpYW2Q= =yIqY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--