From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 20 19:08:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC22516A408 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=fe7d75280325825cf2627382be199f45d6100d32=311=es.net=oberman@es.net) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal1.es.net [198.128.3.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C3013C4CE for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=fe7d75280325825cf2627382be199f45d6100d32=311=es.net=oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by postal1.es.net (Postal Node 1) with ESMTP (SSL) id ZXC48957; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:08:57 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 9A34445058; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:08:57 -0700 (PDT) To: "Alexey Karagodov" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1177096137_69529P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:08:57 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20070420190857.9A34445058@ptavv.es.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:08:58 -0000 --==_Exmh_1177096137_69529P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 > From: "Alexey Karagodov" > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > and what is this, i mean why: > WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant > WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. I thought it was pretty clear. ipsec is not multi-processor safe and requires the use of GIANT. If you have IPSEC in your kernel the network stack will also be giant locked which will cut performance. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 --==_Exmh_1177096137_69529P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002 iD8DBQFGKQ/Jkn3rs5h7N1ERAl+EAJ9JKtHeHIzNPEJByOpIoyKLDiEnzQCfcThr n9li2ZpnCQtjUdcrmnXxd7I= =fdJm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1177096137_69529P--