From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 5 00:22:42 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA09132 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 00:22:42 -0700 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id AAA09110 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 00:22:34 -0700 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de with SMTP (5.67b+/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) id AA04326; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 09:22:23 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.9/8.6.9-s1) with UUCP id JAA03730 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 09:22:22 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id JAA04588 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 09:00:06 +0200 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199504050700.JAA04588@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: Colorado Jumbo 250MB ft, and FreeBSD 2.0R To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD hackers) Date: Wed, 5 Apr 1995 09:00:05 +0200 (MET DST) In-Reply-To: <199504050234.TAA09378@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Apr 4, 95 07:34:43 pm Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 1374 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > I submitted a patch some time ago but nobody committed it. ... > > I have tested the patch here, and it is sitting in my tree ready for commit, > I am waiting on Joerg Wunsch to finish his review of it (since I only > had a drive to test with for a short time, and only one model of drive > I felt it best to get a second review before commiting). Sorry for not getting back on this... My old test machine crashed by the weekend. Unfortunately, it looks that my old (& cheap) Insight tape drive is disfunctional. So all i could do is to have a look at the patch (and it looks ok), without being able to actually test it with a floppy tape drive. Rod, go and commit it. I hope there are some other people with ft drives around who can finally test them, perhaps with the next snap release. > > The fix within ft to avoid the messages works, but the correct way to > > remove them is to get them out of the fd driver in the first place. ... > > Some one from the fdc driver camp care to comment about this? It's the topmost entry in my TODO list. I'm just sitting and wait for Rod to commit his changes. I promise 2.1 will not complain too much about ``ready for output in input''... :) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)