From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jun 22 10:36:10 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA21293
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA21284
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA29973; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu>
cc: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de>, Peter Mutsaers <plm@xs4all.nl>,
        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: tcl -- what's going on here. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Jun 1996 12:00:07 EDT."
             <Pine.OSF.3.91.960622115222.8870B-100000@ginger.eng.umd.edu> 
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:35:32 -0700
Message-ID: <29971.835464932@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> True, but the tcl move seems to raise other questions, doesn't it ...
> like, why should we have tcl without tk?  If we have tk, shouldn't we 
> have XFree86?

No and no.  I think you're unclear on the concept, actually.  Tk is as
much a part of TCL as /bin/true is part of the UNIX kernel.  TCL is
the framework, and whether you add in something like expect, tk, tclX
or tcl-dp later is truly your own business.

						Jordan