From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 20:58:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48EA1065673 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomelite82@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F188FC12 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggeq3 with SMTP id q3so4404707gge.13 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:58:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=G2rg1FuVTd7O4sKlym33CTpuZof8CouEQeBwznQ3h5Q=; b=EhCnVwIhSJddwzCY8n8YcbsIRbimVYMH8sDISIYYXHIaSPC374ZC9Nf5uFZbkUPuSG pg111ErsCMzpOXjqyxXY0fEraECKE/baa4XvWaBZ6P2M2/3ODO82UWbZIaov48OMPy6F Q/wPu/rLHRq+3r7J95MQHMZKdyh6njxprhxlU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.195.9 with SMTP id s9mr18950248ybf.67.1318885095986; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomelite82@gmail.com Received: by 10.151.78.21 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:58:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:58:15 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: EHfcp2OxG6cBy5RaYZLwm6b4kto Message-ID: From: Qing Li To: Pete French Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 and aliases on loopback interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:58:16 -0000 I will commit the patch later today. -- Qing On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Pete French wr= ote: >> I uploaded a patch last night for this issue, it's sitting at >> >> =A0 =A0http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/in6.c.diff > > I just tested this and works fine for me too - was actually tearing > my hair out, as I asked how to do this on STABLE last week > and got the answer "clone lo1", which I tested and worked, but > then trying to deploy it in anger these last few days it seemed to > have stopped working. Seems I picked just the wrong time to do an > upgrade :-) > > Any chnace of getting it into -STABLE in the next few days ? > > cheers, > > -pete. >