From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 18 11:49:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5091B37B401; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5F443FAF; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:49:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (root@tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.9/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h3IInckh008520; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:49:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by thought.org (8.12.6/8.11.3) id h3IIna7R005089; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:49:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:49:34 -0700 From: Gary D Kline To: "E. J. Cerejo" Message-ID: <20030418184934.GB4977@tao.thought.org> References: <20030418180758.GA4820@tao.thought.org> <3EA042AC.9070305@laposte.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EA042AC.9070305@laposte.net> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 16 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i cc: Gary D Kline cc: FreeBSD Mailing List cc: OpenOffice Mailing List Subject: Re: is this portupgrade command close? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 18:49:42 -0000 On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 02:23:40PM -0400, E. J. Cerejo wrote: > > > # portupgrade -bP openoffice-1.0.3 > > If you want to keep a backup of the older files and build a package > after install then it is the command but it won't upgrade the > dependencies. If dependencies need to be upgraded also you might end up > with different versions of dependencies. > Since I'm not interested in keeping a backup or build a package I always > use this: > > # portupgrade -R port_name > > The -R makes sure it builds my out of date dependencies also > Since I have the newer 1.0.3 src I could just rebuild here. That may be the more rational approch if I were to do a src upgrade. Shouldn't the dependencies be correctly configured in the package tarball? gary PS: thx for your oreillynet pointer in your next post. > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix