From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 20 07:03:39 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F67B37B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 May 2003 07:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA51443FBD
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 May 2003 07:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4KE3XC2032878;
	Tue, 20 May 2003 16:03:33 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Heiko Schaefer <hschaefer@fto.de>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 May 2003 14:58:34 +0200."
             <20030520144927.I60060@daneel.foundation.hs> 
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:03:33 +0200
Message-ID: <32877.1053439413@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gbde performance question 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 14:03:39 -0000

In message <20030520144927.I60060@daneel.foundation.hs>, Heiko Schaefer writes:
>> >but i still don't see why the processes that are named gbde-something
>> >would take up _that_ much cpu time ... does that look reasonable and
>> >explicable to you?
>>
>> The crypto work _does_ take time.  I am only just starting to measure
>> how much for my GBDE paper now, so I don't really have anything
>> to compare your numbers with.
>
>well, from what i read, any modern cpu should be capable to do raw aes in
>the order of magnitude of hundreds of MB/s.

Don't confuse Mbit/sec and Mbyte/sec :-)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.