From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 13:13:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447DA106564A for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB088FC0A for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id PAA14149; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:13:11 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Roakp-000JQD-Ey; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:13:11 +0200 Message-ID: <4F1AB9E5.5050302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:13:09 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dwayne MacKinnon References: <201201191706.46553.dmk@ncf.ca> <4F19A317.3070503@FreeBSD.org> <20120120192446.GA18747@lonesome.com> <201201201656.05155.dmk@ncf.ca> In-Reply-To: <201201201656.05155.dmk@ncf.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Odd reboot problems with 9.0-RELEASE i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:13:59 -0000 on 20/01/2012 23:56 Dwayne MacKinnon said the following: > As there is interest, I've redone my kernel config in the style espoused by > Andriy & Mark. This looks much more manageable. Unfortunately, I do not see anything that could have cause the problem that you've reported. > On January 20, 2012 02:24:46 PM Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:23:35PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> I think that it probably could be easier for you and for those reviewing >>> your kernel config if you 'include'-d GENERIC into your kernel config >>> and then used device/nodevice, options/nooptions, etc to make your >>> customizations. >> >> I strongly recommend this path. >> >> It took a long period of time to factor out the crazy kernel configs that >> were used all over the package building nodes. The "stuff that changed" >> wound up only being ~15 lines, 10 of which were common to all nodes and >> archs. The rest were minor tweaks. >> >> But there was no way to tell that without a lot of detective work. >> >> mcl -- Andriy Gapon