Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 13:01:56 +0300 (EET DST) From: mika ruohotie <bsdhack@shadows.aeon.net> To: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed) Cc: terry@lambert.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 430TX ? Message-ID: <199704111001.NAA28678@shadows.aeon.net> In-Reply-To: <199704102254.PAA05935@freefall.freebsd.org> from Darren Reed at "Apr 11, 97 08:48:44 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Is the 430TX chipset recognised/supported yet ? > > Is this a PCI chipset? > Yes, the "latest" from Intel (advertised as faster than HX and VX). right. a chipset without EEC support, without ability to cache above 64 megs ram... need i say more? ok, so it does have sgram support, so what? see if i care. this is one of those times when i'm more than just dissapointed into intel's developers... makes me wonder how can they not include something they already have invented into it. what the people wouldve needed would've been chipset with support for over 512 megs cacheable ram, ofcourse using sgram. (and ofcourse with like 1024/2048k cache option) or atleast a product that's not WORSE then their earlier products. seriously people, HX boards are the ones to get. mickey
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704111001.NAA28678>