From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sun Aug 7 09:34:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6F5BB0C7C; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 09:34:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D0E4172F; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 09:34:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from anthias (vie-188-118-252-241.dsl.sil.at [188.118.252.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFCAC3F49D; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 05:34:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 11:34:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Roman Bogorodskiy cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r418285 - in head/sysutils: . uefi-edk2-bhyve uefi-edk2-bhyve-csm In-Reply-To: <201607091610.u69GA8kt092183@repo.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201607091610.u69GA8kt092183@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 09:34:11 -0000 On Sat, 9 Jul 2016, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > - Use USE_GCC instead of direct dependency Nice. > Modified: head/sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve/Makefile > ============================================================================== > +USE_GCC= 4.8 Is that really stricly GCC 4.8, or would "GCC 4.8 or later" work? In the latter case, we'd write this as "USE_GCC=4.8+" (or "USE_GCC=yes" even). Gerald