From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Tue Mar 15 01:24:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB69AD10AD; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@fubar.geek.nz) Received: from kif.fubar.geek.nz (kif.fubar.geek.nz [178.62.119.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D06DE7; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@fubar.geek.nz) Received: from zapp (unknown [210.164.9.11]) by kif.fubar.geek.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6A39D78FE; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:18:25 +0900 From: Andrew Turner To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r296861 - in head/sys: arm/arm powerpc/powerpc Message-ID: <20160315101825.0b8ecf13@zapp> In-Reply-To: <201603141455.u2EEtFSL014609@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201603141455.u2EEtFSL014609@repo.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:24:14 -0000 On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:55:15 +0000 (UTC) "Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote: > Author: bz > Date: Mon Mar 14 14:55:15 2016 > New Revision: 296861 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/296861 > > Log: > Only check for SYS_freebsd6_lseek if the syscall code is defined. > Whether this is the right or best solution is unclear but it fixes > the build for now. We should make it an error if someone tries to build an ARM kernel with COMPAT_FREEBSD6. I think there was some support for ARM in 6, however we have switched the ABI since then so any old programs will now fail to run. Having it would be even more of a bug on armv6. This was added for 10.0 and, given running arm (v4/v5) programs on an armv6 kernel is unsupported there should be no reason to include it in the kernel. Andrew