From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Apr 11 13:24:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C5437B422; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:24:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (robert@fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f3BKPHf93955; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:25:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:25:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: "Brian F. Feldman" Cc: Peter Jeremy , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Features to facilitate correctness and regression testing In-Reply-To: <200104110942.f3B9gJa17869@green.dyndns.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > As far as enabling the non-intrusive regression instrumentation by > default, I think in -CURRENT it should be, so there should be two > options which both enable regression test instrumentation and which > enable intrusive instrumentation. In this particular case, I don't > think there's anything to lose by enabling that syscall by default as a > "non-intrusive" frob. You could always just write support for that > operation into procfs(4) ;) For "options REGRESSION" compile-time enabled system calls, is it worth introducing a , or should they just be stuffed into other related include files? Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message