From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 12 05:20:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3517F71 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 05:20:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761438FC0C for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 05:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c13so86635eek.13 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:20:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+2fnhkgzmvDWZNdZXcCtrWfZVRYZBlOtmo3J635eI3M=; b=JK4jjSwW52/h1onvlql9pxNwtMKztA1an4atlCmf2PIUibtAne/k4Iw2GoAzR1ZMCM a8DN3CzRwWWZLWIsFtyS1ZDyoA7z5KvLgHFxk0xZ9tw3Z6vahGcBaWwbu9fAfdhQjngy liy9+gzFGKHBDn7UALKRgmBauZEtQGnbeDge4PKqEzHcTzSJSz2zAm0ADymLzXRSchA0 Lly8x0ffqGifi2fl+QrAsLJm0qT02i+Fqm452fn0uLhE5vSwSHRslJjc/Itsi9wh1pmy eSm8h4Ylw4Ym37n7w7HdN5cV927wO6C00T9NIQ3WP++UUq1cFmhAoC4EPEXB/c8rO33n VLgg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.213.65 with SMTP id z41mr58943501eeo.29.1352697613250; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:20:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.211.137 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:20:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121112051229.GA1235@mycenae.sbb.rs> References: <20121112051229.GA1235@mycenae.sbb.rs> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:20:13 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: nomenclature for conf files From: Kurt Buff To: Zoran Kolic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 05:20:15 -0000 On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote: > It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's > any difference. Are those 3 line the same? > > WITH_KMS=YES > WITH_KMS="YES" > WITH_KMS=yes With regard to their use in /etc/rc.conf, no, absolutely not. In general, from my experience, only the second one will work. This might, or might not, be true for other uses, but rc.conf is pretty picky about this. Kurt