From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 31 18:29:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41FB1065679 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dg@pki2.com) Received: from btw.pki2.com (btw.pki2.com [IPv6:2001:470:a:6fd::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926778FC1F for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from btw.pki2.com (btw.pki2.com [192.168.23.1]) by btw.pki2.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4VITEnO050592 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 31 May 2012 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg@pki2.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Dennis Glatting X-X-Sender: dennisg@btw.pki2.com To: Oscar Hodgson In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Dennis Glatting X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: q4VITEnO050592 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: dg@pki2.com Cc: Kaya Saman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone using freebsd ZFS for large storage servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 18:29:19 -0000 On Thu, 31 May 2012, Oscar Hodgson wrote: > That helps. Thank you. > > This is an academic departmental instructional / research environment. > We had a great relationship with Sun, they provided great > opportunities to put Solaris in front of students. Oracle, not so > much, and the Oracle single-tier support model simply isn't affordable > for this "business" (there's no ROI at the departmental level ). > Solaris is not a viable option. > > FreeBSD looks like the next best available option at the moment, > particularly considering the use of the storage heads as compute > machines. OpenIndiana shows promise. Nexenta has a great product, > but the user community expects more flexibility in software options. > > Is there anything like a list of "supported" (known good) SAS HBA's? > Most of my HBAs are LSI controllers flashed T. I'm fond of the 9211.