From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 24 2:45:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from bugz.infotecs.ru (bugz.infotecs.ru [195.210.139.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A571537B413 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 02:45:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vel@bugz.infotecs.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by bugz.infotecs.ru (8.11.6/8.11.4) id f7O9jmH01400 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:45:48 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from vel) From: "Eugene L. Vorokov" Message-Id: <200108240945.f7O9jmH01400@bugz.infotecs.ru> Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:45:48 +0400 (MSD) In-Reply-To: <20010824114026.F1095@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> from "Alexander Langer" at Aug 24, 2001 11:40:26 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > It's kinda late in the process to be complaining about this, but I just noticed this myself... Why not just symlink csh to tcsh then ? vel@bugz:/sys/modules/paudit # ls -l /bin/*csh -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 740996 Aug 23 23:19 /bin/csh -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 740996 Aug 23 23:19 /bin/tcsh Is this really reasonable ? Regards, Eugene To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message