From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Mar 24 09:26:41 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA19763
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 09:26:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA19753
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 09:26:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost)
	by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA05389;
	Mon, 24 Mar 1997 12:25:31 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 12:25:30 -0500 (EST)
From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: langfod@dihelix.com, hasty@rah.star-gate.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Cool Web page interface to mail + search engine?
In-Reply-To: <199703241704.KAA22887@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970324121850.2803D-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 24 Mar 1997, Terry Lambert wrote:

> We still don't message-ID stamp the messages on receipt by majordomo,
> do we?

I don't know where they are getting stamped, but 100% of the
~40,000 messages I grabbed for header field analysis had
message-ID fields, and the presence of in-reply-to fields was a
very close match with subject lines beginning with "Re:". 

-john