Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:59:20 +0100 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de> To: Eric Bautsch <eric.bautsch@pobox.com> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Bridges on VLAN-tagged interfaces. Message-ID: <B5F26EB1-2779-4AD0-9A4F-8417A94E9367@punkt.de> In-Reply-To: <77aa3369-a6f0-e9c4-e54e-9fab0d41a937@pobox.com> References: <c3bbab99-1612-2f65-644f-a380f8233e11@pobox.com> <716a2edd-96f5-c263-2bd4-38a30808f241@omnilan.de> <050a68a3-7581-4985-e54a-e045259e8cfd@omnilan.de> <aadfded1-b3d6-23cd-a1db-88b86b11f73b@pobox.com> <77aa3369-a6f0-e9c4-e54e-9fab0d41a937@pobox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > Am 18.03.2019 um 22:12 schrieb Eric Bautsch <eric.bautsch@pobox.com>: > I now have a bridge0 on re0.33 which works, great. > I now configure a bridge1 which contains re0 and put an IP on that bridge, and hey presto, that IP pings, but the IP on bridge0 on VLAN 33 stops pinging. IMHO you should not be mixing VLAN tagged and untagged traffic on the same interface. A port is a trunk port carrying tagged traffic or an access port carrying untagged traffic only. So you should - again, my opinion - create a VLAN, say 1 on re0 and put re0.1 into bridge1. I know this works from experience. We have some rare performance issues when combining this with VNET but first things first … still investigating and I’ll keep the list informed. Kind regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe info@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B5F26EB1-2779-4AD0-9A4F-8417A94E9367>