From owner-cvs-all Tue Sep 24 10:59:38 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E340437B4A2 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:59:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heaven.gigo.com (heaven.gigo.com [64.57.102.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0A143E4A for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:59:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lioux@brturbo.com) Received: from 200-193-225-061-bsace7003.dsl.telebrasilia.net.br (200-193-225-061-bsace7003.dsl.telebrasilia.net.br [200.193.225.61]) by heaven.gigo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFCEB8C5 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 78487 invoked by uid 1001); 24 Sep 2002 17:50:27 -0000 Message-ID: <20020924175027.78486.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:50:05 -0300 From: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/codemedic Makefile References: <200209241722.g8OHMdwZ080020@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020924172418.GW69627@procyon.firepipe.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020924172418.GW69627@procyon.firepipe.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.7-PRERELEASE X-Disclaimer: I hope you find what you are looking for... in life :) Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:23:56AM -0700, Will Andrews wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:22:39AM -0700, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > > Modified files: > > devel/codemedic Makefile > > Log: > > Mark NO_PACKAGE since it ignores CXX because it breaks if CXX is > > other than g++ > > I don't understand your reasoning here. Just because something > can only be compiled with g++ doesn't mean we can't package it. I was just following the reasoning in the Porters Handbook. It states that things that do not respect C{C,XX,FLAS} should be marked as so. So far, we have been using NO_PACKAGE to do that. I have no problem with marking it otherwise. :) I was just following protocol. Besides, I can't seem to be able to fix a building issue in this port. Some interaction between bison and g++. So, I'll probably mark it BROKEN if I can't find a solution before the ports freeze is over. NO_PACKAGE is the smaller of our concerns with this port. Such a shame. :( -- Mario S F Ferreira - DF - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature." Computer Science Undergraduate | FreeBSD Committer | CS Developer flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org feature, n: a documented bug | bug, n: an undocumented feature To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message