Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:16:38 -0700
From:      Jim Harris <jim.harris@gmail.com>
To:        John <jwd@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD-scsi <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Samsung PM1725a NVMe SSD experience?
Message-ID:  <CAJP=Hc8GYkrMmh01W7Kqw_B7L4rgczKAV9MqU1FHw%2BtASqOcOg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180928225259.GA10949@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20180928225259.GA10949@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi John,

I'm just curious - why do you think the kernel will not probe/attach to it?

I don't have any experience with this SSD.  But nvme(4) will automatically
attach to any NVMe SSD that presents the the correct PCI class/subclass/PI
- it doesn't need an explicit device/vendor ID in the pci_ids table.  The
pci_ids table is for SSDs that require quirks or to show a model-specific
name.  It looks like the PM1725a is actually in the pci_ids list so it
should be covered either way.

Regards,

-Jim


On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 3:53 PM John <jwd@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Hi Folks -
>
>    Has anyone on this list had any experiences with:
>
>
> https://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/global.semi.static/Samsung_PM1725a_NVMe_SSD-0.pdf
>
>    Specifically I'm looking at the 1.6TB PCI Express Gen3 x8
> adapter card version. Looking through the source I'm not
> sure the kernel will probe/attach it.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJP=Hc8GYkrMmh01W7Kqw_B7L4rgczKAV9MqU1FHw%2BtASqOcOg>