From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 10 18:11:05 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F9699F;
 Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:11:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559458FC08;
 Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:11:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
 id 1B2095605D; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:11:05 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:11:05 -0500
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has
 been committed
Message-ID: <20121010181105.GB22221@lonesome.com>
References: <20121010004523.GA15209@lonesome.com>
 <20121010151107.GA23777@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121010151107.GA23777@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:11:05 -0000

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:11:07PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> Can we arrange exp builds with FORCE_BASE_CC_FOR_TESTING=clang that
> will report all ports with USE_GCC=* but build with clang?

Sure.  That was kind of the intention.

mcl