From owner-freebsd-security  Sat Jun 20 05:32:33 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA19771
          for freebsd-security-outgoing; Sat, 20 Jun 1998 05:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA19762
          for <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 20 Jun 1998 05:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au)
Message-Id: <199806201232.FAA19762@hub.freebsd.org>
Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA014925843; Sat, 20 Jun 1998 22:30:43 +1000
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: non-executable stack?
To: ncb05@uow.edu.au (Nicholas Charles Brawn)
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 1998 22:30:43 +1000 (EST)
Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980620211437.13013A-100000@banshee.cs.uow.edu.au> from "Nicholas Charles Brawn" at Jun 20, 98 09:21:14 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In some mail from Nicholas Charles Brawn, sie said:
> 
> I was pondering the following after reading about solaris 2.6's
> non-executable stack option.

If it is of any benefit, the option isn't available for Solaris-x86,
nor the older SPARC chips.

Darren

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message