From owner-cvs-all  Sun Jul 23 14:50:29 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.osd.bsdi.com (zippy.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6342F37BB6A; Sun, 23 Jul 2000 14:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com)
Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.osd.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA15540;
	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 14:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com)
To: obrien@FreeBSD.org
Cc: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/scripts print-cdrom-packages.sh 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 23 Jul 2000 10:54:03 PDT."
             <20000723105403.A83797@dragon.nuxi.com> 
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 14:50:14 -0700
Message-ID: <15537.964389014@localhost>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> We had a discussion on IRC and attempted to decide how popular and how
> many people we knew using the ports in this list.  Not science, but we
> need *some* ordering to use if the available package space on disc1
> decreases.

I think there is still a good argument behind standardizing on ONE
version of a given tool and not try for the vector of "all versions of
all popular tools" or we're just screwing ourselves.  With ncftp, a
can of worms was opened which should simply be immediately closed by
picking one release of ncftp and sticking with it.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message