From owner-freebsd-office@freebsd.org Mon Feb 15 00:10:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769B7AA9D27 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615891DAD for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5F0EFAA9D26; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: office@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB2EAA9D25 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3535C1DAB for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1F0A8TI084600 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:10:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199601] devel/boost-all: Upgrade to 1.58, 1.59, or 1.60 Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:10:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rakuco@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:10:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D199601 Raphael Kubo da Costa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakuco@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #49 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- Created attachment 167007 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D167007&action= =3Dedit devel/qt4-moc patch with additional Boost include guards I'd appreciate it if kde@ is added to the loop when a Boost upgrade causes problems with moc-qt4 so we can try to fix it in moc itself instead of patc= hing many files in several ports. For one, I've updated the moc section in https://wiki.freebsd.org/BoostPortingProject/1.55-to-1.60 with an explanati= on of why moc breaks and another approach to solving these issues. I also added some context to the existing qt4-moc patch in ports r408911. This attachment contains a patch to devel/qt4-moc that defines more include guards so that the Boost 1.60 headers that include the headers moc can't pa= rse (basically, any header that uses macros in a namespace declaration) are skipped. I was able to build all ports in https://wiki.freebsd.org/BoostPortingProject/1.55-to-1.60 that were failing because of moc without having to patch any of them at all (basically revert= ing most of ports r408472, ports r408473, ports r408474, ports r408475, ports r408502, ports r408773, ports r408419, but also including all ports with a column saying "fixed by qt4-moc patch"). If there's no objection, I'd like to commit it to qt4-moc and remove all patches added in the revisions above that wrap Boost includes within #ifndef Q_MOC_RUN blocks. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=