From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 30 13:50:45 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B1D3F9E
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:50:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.mimar.rs (mail.mimar.rs [193.53.106.129])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05FFBAC
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:50:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.mimar.rs (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082061AF4E5
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:50:37 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mimar.rs; h=
 content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version
 :x-mailer:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date:date
 :received:received; s=mimar-0901; t=1422625834; x=1424440235;
 bh=ZJ+0doXdIy6an4iOb+EM1EntKZM0NVKxg6zJlUlStm4=; b=k/+TLZmEEvdf
 BF7kezhARUGtVPmy1C2jqjYDUUUoNC1Xgt1vcUyhfXJqlwIz2/NhEVlXu1ATdepf
 YlSLr4z4zSPMM/MqcESTIbw890lq8PPm6mjcXqzDzTBCRVhE4WsRB63if8ksnh5H
 WVRP0BQypUY+3lSE2c5Ywcb1NDU2gWs=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mimar.rs
Received: from mail.mimar.rs ([127.0.0.1])
 by mail.mimar.rs (mail.mimar.rs [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id xUCJ39xunD03 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:50:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from efreet (nat.kappastar.com [193.53.106.34])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs)
 by mail.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D03341AF315
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:50:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:50:33 +0100
From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= <marko.cupac@mimar.rs>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: freebsd-update and lib32
Message-Id: <20150130145033.9c6459154a028e17b2f03f7f@mimar.rs>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:50:45 -0000

Hi,

for years I've been leaving default 'lib32' option during initial
install of FreeBSD selected, but now I am experimenting with a server
which will be 64-bit only.

I have noticed that, after initial install of FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE
without lib32 selected, /usr/lib32 folder is created nevertheless,
containing 3 empty dirs: dtrace, i18n and private. However, running
freebsd-update on such system pulls a bunch of files into /usr/lib32
and its subdirs while updating to FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p5.

Are those files really necessary on 64-bit only system?

Thank you in advance.
--=20
Marko Cupa=C4=87
https://www.mimar.rs