Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 19:28:46 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.org> To: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com>, ports@FreeBSD.org, asami@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New rules for naming patches Message-ID: <20000719192846.B23066@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0007191259480.8615-100000@blues.jpj.net>; from trevor@jpj.net on Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 01:22:49PM -0400 References: <3975CBB2.CE38F8EB@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSI.4.21.0007191259480.8615-100000@blues.jpj.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Trevor Johnson (trevor@jpj.net): > not saying this should be mandatory, so if you find that "patch-1" is > easier for you to work with than > "patch-programs_Xserver_hw_xfree86_input_joystick_Imakefile", or that the > 50 bytes' difference is burdensome, I have no problem with it. Yes, I dislike this one :-) Can't this be shortened? Alex -- cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000719192846.B23066>