From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 17 2: 3:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail.iserver1.net.Netz-Werker.NET (srv1.iserver1.net.Netz-Werker.NET [195.122.150.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511D937B71A for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 02:03:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tomsoft@Netz-Werker.COM) Received: (from tomsoft@localhost) by mail.iserver1.net.Netz-Werker.NET (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA26216; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 11:03:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tomsoft) Message-ID: <20010317110321.22703@Netz-Werker.NET> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 11:03:21 +0100 From: Thomas To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" , Andrea Campi Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: growfs References: <20010311141337.A510@webcom.it> <20010311175929.25940cdc.steveo@eircom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i In-Reply-To: <20010311175929.25940cdc.steveo@eircom.net>; from Steve O'Hara-Smith on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 05:59:29PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, > A completely different question about growfs - is it fit for -stable ? > If so could it be MFC'd (after 4.3 I suppose). I'd be lucky, but as alpha is a supported platform, and growfs is completely untested/ported on/to that platform I think we can't release it yet, so we should not put it to stable. The tests on alpha we can't do, ourselfs, as we're missing our own alpha hardware. So we wait for some feedback from the community. Thomas -- Th.-H.v.Kamptz Die Netz-Werker GmbH To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message