From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 14 06:48:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADCA16A4CE for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 06:48:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com (mailout06.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846FE43D49 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 06:48:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) Received: from fwd05.aul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1C777C-0005D2-05; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:48:34 +0200 Received: from fw.reifenberger.com (EfTbxQZ6YeSqhjp4r6ts6f8av4E4hWZ8zouSEvQn9PS+Rhrd0h33sj@[217.232.234.132]) by fmrl05.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1C7774-0Jjwga0; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:48:26 +0200 Received: from localhost (mike@localhost)i8E6mPFD011613; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:48:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fw.reifenberger.com: mike owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:48:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Reifenberger To: Sean McNeil In-Reply-To: <1095115132.3305.3.camel@server.mcneil.com> Message-ID: <20040914084348.F11577@fw.reifenberger.com> References: <1095106952.9560.14.camel@server.mcneil.com> <1095115132.3305.3.camel@server.mcneil.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-ID: EfTbxQZ6YeSqhjp4r6ts6f8av4E4hWZ8zouSEvQn9PS+Rhrd0h33sj@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: 2334cd6c-090e-4c60-9ab7-e6cf9a8b5272 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bad shared library ordering X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 06:48:37 -0000 On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Sean McNeil wrote: ... >> It's not a problem of your base system either. >> Your ldap/sasl ports are not compiled with WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes >> in /etc/make.conf > > This isn't what I was alluding to. Yes, since I discovered this I've > deleted the package and I'm rebuilding everything. Don't even need > WITH_OPENSSL_BASE set. I think the issue is that, perhaps, rpath is > being used and so the /usr/local/lib version wins. If this is the case > then I see nothing wrong and I just need to do some cleanup. > Yes, its an rpath issue and your system is working as expected. Bye/2 --- Michael Reifenberger, Business Development Manager SAP-Basis, Plaut Consulting Comp: Michael.Reifenberger@plaut.de | Priv: Michael@Reifenberger.com http://www.plaut.de | http://www.Reifenberger.com