From owner-freebsd-advocacy  Tue Apr 13  9: 4:31 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from mail1.atl.bellsouth.net (mail1.atl.bellsouth.net [205.152.0.28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F641557A
	for <advocacy@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 09:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from wghicks@bellsouth.net)
Received: from wghicks.bellsouth.net (host-209-214-77-5.atl.bellsouth.net [209.214.77.5])
	by mail1.atl.bellsouth.net (8.8.8-spamdog/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA19803;
	Tue, 13 Apr 1999 12:00:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from wghicks (wghicks@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wghicks.bellsouth.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA03103;
	Tue, 13 Apr 1999 12:01:52 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wghicks@wghicks.bellsouth.net)
Message-Id: <199904131601.MAA03103@bellsouth.net>
To: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk>
Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Charles Henrich a Star? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 13 Apr 1999 08:27:12 BST."
             <19990413082712.A7233@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> 
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 12:01:52 -0400
From: W Gerald Hicks <wghicks@bellsouth.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"Movie FX company chooses FreeBSD over Linux for increased reliability"

I dunno... might cause a negative backlash with the direct comparison.

I'd just:

"Movie FX company chooses FreeBSD for increased reliability".

Cheers,

Jerry Hicks
wghicks@bellsouth.net


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message