From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Apr 14 09:00:07 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA23187
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 09:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA23165
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 09:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA04920; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 08:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@eurocontrol.fr>
cc: "FreeBSD Current Users' list" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: undelete(2) in unistd.h conflicts with mail/extern.h 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 14 Apr 1997 16:32:38 +0200."
             <19970414163238.59096@caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr> 
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 08:59:54 -0700
Message-ID: <4915.861033594@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> The declaration of undelete(2) conflicts with usr.bin/mail/extern.h
> declaration of undelete() (the function may be found in cmd2.c). I've
> renamed it to mundelete in mail and here is a patch:

[scratch scratch]

I'm puzzled - don't you have commit privileges, Ollivier?  Why are
you routing all your changes through these lists? :-)

Seriously, that's the whole point of being a committer - to cut down
on the chain of delay on getting changes in.  I think you've more than
enough history with us to be trusted to commit such changes directly,
so why not do so?  On the rare occasion that someone disagrees with a
change, they can take it up with you specifically.

					Jordan