From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 9 17:11:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA19114 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 9 May 1998 17:11:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA19109 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 17:11:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA29473; Sat, 9 May 1998 17:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd029470; Sun May 10 00:10:44 1998 Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 17:10:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Ollivier Robert cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, mckusick@mckusick.com Subject: Re: Soft Updates In-Reply-To: <19980510004603.A16999@keltia.freenix.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kirk had some very good arguments but I forget what they were.. On Sun, 10 May 1998, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Julian Elischer: > > you need to use the -n option of tunefs on an unmounted filesystem > > it's not a mount option.. > > Why not BTW ? async/noasync are mount options so one could expect > softupdates to be the same. Is there an reason for the current scheme (not > that I mind but it would make switch it on/off easier, especially for /). > -- > Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr > FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #8: Tue Apr 21 02:45:53 CEST 1998 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message