Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:36:03 +0000
From:      Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Removing documentation
Message-ID:  <56BDFBE3.7050709@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <56BDF2A3.9030100@ohlste.in>
References:  <56B754A8.3030605@marino.st> <56BCE01D.4010701@FreeBSD.org> <56BCE218.40403@marino.st> <CA%2BE3k93iYs1p5Je-AKwJ7pVLdzYgSXWqb4P0XoD0oTJhrkt==Q@mail.gmail.com> <56BCEC5F.4020007@marino.st> <CA%2BE3k930YfN=LADkE7X4a82RSPZ-MSeKkC=U_J8kKDiy6vot=w@mail.gmail.com> <56BDF2A3.9030100@ohlste.in>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--mq71uICANmfquClM6nS7cxfc6nQBmeKeE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 12/02/2016 14:56, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
> This is a good point. I still don't understand why pkg(8) is not in the=

> base (though I imagine there's a reason and it takes less than a minute=

> to install). There can't be many users who install a base system and us=
e
> it without a single additional piece of software. However, for my $0.02=
,
> that is the only change I'd make to base at this point with respect to
> package management, aside from my pkg(8) wishlist. As an aside, and
> fwiw, unless there is a non-GPL'd Ada compiler out there, we won't see
> Ada or any Ada-based binaries in base, even if Synth turns out to be th=
e
> best thing since sliced bread.

The primary reason pkg(8) is not in base is to decouple it from the
FreeBSD release timescale.  Given the promises about API/ABI stability
over a major release branch, development of pkg(8) would be forced to
slow to a crawl.

pkg(8) still has a lot of changes yet to be realized, both in its own
code, and in the code of both the ports and the base system, and in
adjunct software like poudriere or indeed, synth, so it is likely to
remain a 'port' for some time to come.  It is not completely
inconceivable though that at some future point, pkg(8) will have matured
into stability and require little further development, in which case,
importing it to base would be a natural next move.

	Cheers,

	Matthew



--mq71uICANmfquClM6nS7cxfc6nQBmeKeE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=JVrR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mq71uICANmfquClM6nS7cxfc6nQBmeKeE--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56BDFBE3.7050709>