From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug  3 17:27:30 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DE3BB37B401; Sun,  3 Aug 2003 17:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BDB0D43F75; Sun,  3 Aug 2003 17:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h740RSFL005505;
	Sun, 3 Aug 2003 18:27:28 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 18:25:22 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20030803.182522.117793689.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: nyan@FreeBSD.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <200308020514.h725EHrp061638@repoman.freebsd.org>
References: <200308020514.h725EHrp061638@repoman.freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/pci pci_cfgreg.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 00:27:31 -0000

:   PC98 uses different mask of IRQ.

I didn't think that PC98 used PCI BIOS to route interrupts ...  Is
that not the case?

Warner